Leaders already know that people succeed in work they’ve never done. Almost nothing in how companies structure careers reflects it.
In June 2026, Resume Genius surveyed 1,500 U.S. hiring managers. Nearly two-thirds — 65% — had moved an existing employee into a significantly different role. Among those who had, 82% said the move worked out well. Asked what would most influence such a decision, 60% named enthusiasm and attitude, and 56% pointed to evidence the person had already been doing parts of the job informally. Formal training and certifications came in behind both, at 50%. Just 3% said they wouldn’t consider an internal candidate lacking direct prior experience at all.
Read that last figure again. By their own account, the people making these decisions have almost entirely stopped requiring that someone have done the job before. And yet job architectures, promotion ladders, and career conversations across most organizations still run on the opposite assumption — that a career is a single track and progress means going deeper along it.
The timing makes this more than an inconsistency. The work AI is absorbing fastest is precisely the narrow, repeatable, pattern-heavy work that made deep specialization valuable in the first place. Organizations spent decades optimizing for depth, and depth is the part now most exposed.
That tension — between the depth companies still reward and the breadth their own results keep validating — is exactly what David Epstein takes on in Range. His argument turns on a distinction borrowed from psychologist Robin Hogarth: some domains are kind learning environments, where rules are clear, patterns repeat, and feedback arrives fast and accurate. Others are wicked — rules shift, feedback is delayed or misleading, and yesterday’s pattern doesn’t reliably predict tomorrow’s. Early specialization is enormously effective in kind environments. In wicked ones, it’s a liability, because the thing being mastered keeps moving.
The book opens by setting Tiger Woods against Roger Federer. Woods was on a golf course before he could read, the poster case for early, total specialization. Federer moved through a long list of sports — skiing, basketball, handball, wrestling, soccer, table tennis — before committing to tennis relatively late. Both reached the top, but Epstein’s point is that the Federer path, not the Woods path, is the statistical norm among elite performers in complex fields. He extends it well past sport: scientists who did their most important work after switching disciplines, and the finding that Nobel laureates are more than twenty times likelier than their peers to have taken up something like acting, music, or magic on the side. What distinguishes them isn’t a bigger toolkit in one domain. It’s the ability to carry a principle from one domain into another — the thing specialists most often can’t see, because they’re standing too close to their own.
Two ideas worth carrying into the boardroom: Match the career path to the environment, not the fashion. Almost nothing an executive team faces is a kind environment, and structuring careers as if it were produces people who are excellent at conditions that no longer exist. And treat lateral and cross-domain moves as development, not as detours. If breadth is what actually predicts performance in wicked conditions, then a sideways move should read as investment on a career record rather than as lost momentum — which requires changing how those moves are described, measured, and rewarded, not just permitting them.
Read Range →
Best for: Leaders rethinking how their organization develops people, rather than managers looking for a personal career framework. Reading commitment: About six hours, narrative and example-rich rather than prescriptive.
That shift — from asking what someone has already done to asking what they’re demonstrably capable of doing next — is exactly what Gloat is built to operationalize. It’s an AI-powered internal talent marketplace that matches employees to open roles, short-term projects, gigs, and mentorships based on a live inventory of skills and stated aspirations, rather than on job titles and tenure. Because it surfaces work in smaller units than a full role change, it lets someone demonstrate capability in an adjacent domain before anyone has to bet a promotion on it. Its workforce analytics layer also gives leaders something most organizations genuinely lack: a view of which capabilities already exist inside the building, and which jobs are most exposed to automation, in the same picture.
The payoff isn’t hypothetical. Deloitte’s research on skills-based organizations found they’re 98% more likely to retain high performers and 107% more likely to place people in the right roles than organizations still organized around job titles and tenure — the exact outcomes a live internal marketplace like this is built to produce.
It won’t work well at small scale — the matching engine depends on data density, which is why its customer base skews toward very large enterprises, and companies under a thousand people will generally find the cost and complexity outrun the benefit. Integration with existing HR systems is frequently the hard part, and adoption requires managers to release good people to other teams, which no software can compel. But for leaders who suspect the capability they’re recruiting for externally already exists somewhere internally, it turns that suspicion into something they can actually see.
There’s also a chance to put your own thinking in front of a wider audience: this issue brings an exclusive feature placement in Gulf News, arranged through TEI’s media relationships. Gulf News reaches one of the most internationally mobile business audiences anywhere — a region where organizations are building workforces from scratch rather than inheriting fifty-year-old career structures, and where the argument for organizing talent around capability rather than credential lands on unusually receptive ground. TEI’s team handles the interview, drafting, and placement end to end.
Interested? Talk to our team to learn more about this opportunity and discuss the details. Schedule a call through our Calendly, or simply reply to this email and we’ll be happy to assist.
Take with you: Who on your team is already doing work they were never hired to do — and does any system in your company know about it?
The Executive Insight — 169 Madison Ave STE 11570, New York, NY, 10016
